Aircraft Carrier Design and Aircraft

An aircraft carrier comprises several different sections, as do all warships. The lower decks of a carrier are similar to those on other ships. They house the engine rooms and compartments for either oil-fired boilers or nuclear reactors, depending on the type of propulsion being used. (Newer carriers are all nuclear powered. The United States has not built an oil-powered carrier since 1968.) A carrier is driven by four massive propellers, and the ship’s engines can generate over 280,000 horsepower to accelerate the carrier to a speed of just over 56 km/h (35 mph).

The upper areas of an aircraft carrier differ from those of conventional warships. An enormous hangar bay runs the length and width of the ship and is referred to as the first deck, or hangar deck. Planes can be serviced on the hangar deck, safe from the effects of wind and weather. Massive elevators, each the size of a typical home, move aircraft between the hangar deck and the flight deck on top, where the planes take off and land. In the area between the hangar deck and flight deck, called the gallery, the ship’s pilots live, work, and prepare for flights.

The flight deck may look quite large, but it is actually small for all the activities that take place on it. Because the runway is so short, planes must be flung into the air by steam catapults that are built into the flight deck. These catapults are 90 m (300 ft) long and draw their power directly from the ship’s engines; they can accelerate a plane from 0 to 240 km/h (150 mph) in three seconds. Each carrier has four catapults: two on the forward area, or bow, and two in the center area, referred to as amidships. The bow area is only used for launching planes because it is too short for landings. The amidships area and the deck behind it can be used for launching and landing planes. It is angled slightly from the centerline of the ship so that landing planes do not interfere with planes taking off from the bow. All four catapults can be used to launch airplanes in a hurry, but during continuous exercises, planes need to land in order to refuel and reload ammunition. When landings are taking place, planes are launched only off the bow catapults so that other jets can land on the angled area. The bow area can also serve as a parking area, out of the way of landings, when launches are not taking place.

Overlooking the flight deck area on the right, or starboard, side is the carrier’s command and control tower, referred to as the island. The island is small, so as not to encroach on valuable flight deck space. The seven-story structure is covered with antennas and radar scanners. The top level of the island is like the control tower at an airport. Here, the ship’s air boss, or controller, controls the movement of planes on the flight deck and those flying near the ship. The next level below the controller is the carrier’s pilothouse, also referred to as the bridge. On the bridge, the captain and other members of the crew control the ship’s speed and direction.

Unlike other warships such as cruisers and destroyers, a carrier has very few weapons built directly onto the ship itself. The aircraft on board the ship serve as its primary weapon. American carriers have the widest variety of aircraft. The typical 86-plane air wing of an American carrier is composed of several types of offensive aircraft. Fighter aircraft include F-14 Tomcat fighters (to shoot down enemy planes that may try to attack the carrier) and F/A-18 Hornet strike fighters (a type of plane that can both drop bombs and shoot down enemy planes). Support aircraft on board include the E-2C Hawkeye airborne early warning aircraft (the only plane on the ship still flown by propellers). It carries a large radar and transmits information back to the carrier, so the ship knows what is going on up to 480 km (300 mi) away. The EA-6B Prowler electronic warfare airplane jams enemy radar, and the S-3B Viking antisubmarine airplane hunts for enemy subs and sinks them if they get too close to the carrier. A carrier also carries about a half dozen SH-60F Ocean Hawk helicopters, which can also hunt submarines, as well as rescue any pilots who suffer an accident. See also Military Aviation.

Landing a plane on a carrier is a complicated procedure that requires tremendous skill on the part of the pilot. When planes are cleared to land, pilots come in behind the ship, lower the landing gear and tailhook, and line up with a series of lights and lenses on the carrier commonly called the meatball. The meatball tells pilots if they are too high or too low as they are coming in to land. Their goal is to keep the light centered in the middle of the set of lenses. Navy pilots refer to this procedure as “calling the ball.” As the plane crosses over the carrier deck, the tailhook snags one of four heavy steel cables stretched across the deck, bringing the plane to a stop in about 90 m (300 ft) of deck space.

When carrier pilots land (or trap, as Navy pilots like to call it), they apply full power to their engines so that if the cables break (which happens rarely) they will have enough power to fly off and try to land again. Landings are made both day and night in clear and bad weather. Pilots prefer to land on large carriers, not because of the larger landing area, but because a large carrier is steadier since it weighs more, and therefore does not pitch as much in heavy seas.

Aviation Industry is 1958: Military Aviation (Manned Aircraft)

New contracts for advanced military aircraft placed during 1958 re-emphasized the fact that these will be part of the industry picture far into the future. In fact, some experts predict that manned spacecraft will eventually take over the lead role from the unmanned missile systems. North American won the competition for the 2,000 mph B-70 chemical bomber (formerly designated the WS-110A). The same company also has the contract for the 2,000 mph F-108 long-range interceptor. Looking further ahead, the Air Force awarded study contracts for the Dyna-Soar Mach 10 bomber (7,600 mph at sea level). This plane will be raised to about a 50-100 mi. altitude by a missile booster engine before its own rocket engines take over. Study work will be done by two competing teams of major contractors. One team, made up of six top companies, will be headed up by the Martin Co., and another similar team by Boeing.

 

Aviation Industry is 1958: Inventory

The backlog for manufacturers of complete systems stood at $13.75 billion as of June 30, 1958, a substantial drop from the 1957 figure of $16.3 billion. The main reason for this was the change-over in military buying due to the cut-backs in 1957, and the increased emphasis on missiles. Missiles such as the ICBM are still in the development stage and, in addition, will not be ordered in the production quantities formerly applied to manned aircraft. Of this backlog, about 70-75 per cent is military orders.

 

Aviation in 1953: Transport Plane Developments (Great Britain’s Atlantic Jetliner Service)

Great Britain’s proposed Avro Atlantic delta-wing 74-113-passenger jetliner will reputedly fly from New York to London in 5 to 5y hours. Its specifications are: span, 121 ft.; length, 145 ft.; fuselage diameter, 12y ft.; gross takeoff weight, 200,000 lb.; payload, 20,000-45,000 lb.; cruising speed, 600 mph; cruising altitude, 40,000-45,000 ft.; minimum runway class, ICAO Class C; minimum runway strength, ICAO Class 4; pressure differential, 8.8 pounds per sq. in.; cabin capacity, 58,000 cu. ft.; and baggage capacity, 1,930 cu. ft.

The engines are enclosed in the wing, which also houses the fuel tanks. Although the Atlantic is described as a civil development of the Vulcan bomber the jetliner is much larger than the bomber. An Atlantic prototype could be flying by the end of 1956, and production aircraft could start coming off the line two years later.

 

Aviation in 1954: An overview

During 1954 the aircraft manufacturing industry adjusted itself to the changes in emphasis on procurement of various aircraft types intended to modernize the air forces and to the modifications in the program resulting from the cessation of hostilities in Korea. Some of the cutbacks affected the subcontractors in the defense production program.

New and improved airliners had again shrunk the world and cut time from domestic schedules in the new non-stop transcontinental services. Promise of even shorter time to fly across the American continent was in the foreseeable future.

The cutback and stretch-out of the defense production program following the end of hostilities in Korea resulted in reduction of subcontracts by the larger manufacturers, and grave concern was felt for the subcontractors and suppliers. The results were intense competition as small firms went out of business and government-owned facilities idled. Under the theoretical laws of economics this condition would be adjusted in due course, with the elimination of the weaker units and a general strengthening of the industry. But that segment of industry devoted primarily or exclusively to defense production does not operate in complete accord with basic economic laws for several reasons. Many of these plants produce specialized products suitable for defensive equipment alone. If they close down, it weakens the defense production program. So the government wisely attempts to keep them going even if it must maintain their facilities. It still takes precious time, in case of need, to mobilize manpower to reactivate them.

As the year drew to a close the full extent of the damage was not known accurately, but watchful eyes were studying the situation to be sure the efficiency of the program was not impaired and that vital small organizations were not too frequently disbanded.

As a result of this situation two associations of west coast subcontractors were formed to advocate a higher volume of subcontracting, and those agencies of government concerned with small business were seeking corrective measures.

During the fiscal year ending June 1954, the Air Materiel Command (AMC) of the U.S. Air Force spent $11.4 billion of which more than $8 billion went for hardware and weapons systems for the Air Force. In June 1954, AMC had contracts totaling $17 billion for equipment to be furnished by U.S. industry. During that fiscal year the Command shipped four and one-half million tons of supplies to 30 Air Force bases and 1,800 other military installations throughout the world, handled 39 million supply items and stockpiled more than 800,000 types of items in depots.

For aircraft and related procurement, AMC obligations totaled an estimated $4,405 million for the fiscal year ending June 1955, $2,760 million in new money and an estimated $1,645 million carried over from the previous year.

For major procurement other than aircraft, such as electronics equipment, etc., AMC obligations for 1955 totaled $405 million, $305 million in new money and $100 million carried over from the previous fiscal year.

After a mid-summer slump in both Air Force and Navy obligations for equipment, there was a sudden spurt in production orders during the six-week period beginning Sept. 1, 1954 which resulted in new Air Force contracts totaling $1,037 million during that period.

In addition to accelerated purchases of the B-52 jet bomber and North American F-100 fighter, orders were placed for the Convair B-58 Hustler supersonic bomber, Lockheed F-104 light day fighter, and Boeing KC-135 jet tanker adopted from the Boeing 707, first U.S. jet transport plane.

Other Air Force orders placed during the summer of 1954 included such aircraft as the Sikorsky H-37 helicopter for the Army, the Lockheed C-130 turboprop transport, the Convair C-131 transport and the Beech T-34 trainer.

Engine orders totaling $73 million included such makers as Pratt & Whitney and Ford for the J-57 engine, Allison Division of General Motors for the J-71 jet and T-56 turboprop, and General Electric for the J-73.

 

Aviation in 1955: Atomic Powered Aircraft (Tandem Plane)

A proposal for a tandem plane arrangement has been advanced. An atomic-powered craft would be a drone, operating as a tug and pulling a second plane which would contain the crew and payload. The manned plane, having its own power plant, could cut loose for landing at a conventional airport or, if it were brought onto the remotely-located runways likely to be needed for nuclear-powered planes, it could cut its towline connection and taxi to the regular hangar area for unloading.

Another proposal calls for a detachable nose section. It would house the crew and have its own taxiing gear and power plant. After landing on the appropriate atomic runway, the crew would cast off from the power plant section and taxi to the hangar.

 

Aviation Industry in 1957: Helicopter Production (Space Flight)

The tremendous advances in rocket-missile technology during 1957 indicated that the science fiction dream of space travel is much closer than might have been expected. A number of new companies expressly interested in outer space research have arisen in recent years. Aeronutronic Systems, Inc. was the prime contractor for the Farside project which fired a rocket 4,000 mi. into space, while Systems Laboratories Corp. has stated its belief that flight to the moon will be possible in 10 years.

Aviation Industry in 1957: Employment

At the end of the first quarter of 1957, the aircraft industry led all other manufacturing industries in employment with 899,200 on its payrolls. This figure reached a high of 909,000 in April. However, shortly after this, Congressional cuts in military requests for 1958 caused the Department of Defense to order total spending for 1957-1958 reduced from a projected $42,000,000,000 to $38,000,000,000. The United States Air Force cancellation of the Navaho missile to be built by North American Aviation, for example, caused that firm to discharge about 12,000 employees. Another cancelled missile was the Navy’s medium range surface-to-surface missile Triton. As a result, employment figures dropped sharply in the latter half of the year to an estimated 800,000 by year’s end. This placed the industry second again to the automotive industry as top employer in the country.

 

Aviation in 1955: Naval Aeronautical Turbine Test Station

A $30,000,000, 65-acre, flight propulsion laboratory was opened by the Navy at West Trenton, N.J. Called the Naval Aeronautical Turbine Test Station, it is probably the most complete facility of its kind in the world. Altitudes from sea level to 65,000 ft., air speeds from subsonic at sea level to supersonic at high altitudes, and temperature conditions ranging from -67° to 150°F. May be simulated there.

One of the five test cells recently finished is the only test rig known to the Navy that is capable of subjecting complete turboprop engines to wide extremes of altitude and temperature. It contains an inlet throat with a variable orifice which can be adjusted to a wide range of propeller diameters. Large-capacity refrigeration equipment and a separate heater system make it possible to cold-soak power plants to -67°F. To test cold starting of engines and to subject them to Arctic operating conditions. With all the machinery in operation, the test facility has a connected working load of almost 100,000 hp.

In the supervisory control room, built on the front of the test wing, a 35-ft. central control panel enables engineers to supervise the functioning of every part of the laboratory, give permission to operate equipment, and direct air flow. More than 23 mi. of copper tubing and 26 mi. of thermocouple wiring focus vital information from all parts of the laboratory on the panel. Controls are of the ‘permissive’ type — manual on-off interlocks which prevent any machinery from being started until all operating requirements have been satisfied. Any emergency can be spotted immediately in the supervisory control room and pushing a single button can shut down the entire laboratory. The engineers at the control panel act as coordinators to assure that all parts of the complex laboratory function in unison. They give permission to operators on the spot to set machinery in motion.

 

Aviation in 1955: An overview

An event of significance to the aviation industry came late in the year when Secretary of Defense Charles E. Wilson announced a rise of $500,000,000 in the estimate of Defense Department expenditures for the fiscal year 1956. This gave a total Defense budget of $34,500,000,000. The action followed a thorough study by top Pentagon officials in the Air Force of the possible effects of various economy moves on the defense program. Although the Administration has made determined efforts to reduce expenditures in order to balance the budget, it appears unlikely at this time that President or Congress can risk the political implications of a sharply curtailed defense program, and it must be remembered that the recommendations of the Congressional Air Policy Board for a minimum peacetime air-strength have not yet been achieved.